Post by jabinkhatun908 on Feb 26, 2024 20:31:47 GMT -7
Governor of Buenos Aires. But what is important in this article's argument is that the first and only election of Peronist internal presidential candidates was not followed by a bureaucratization of justice but by the emergence of a leadership that lasted for years. So much so that integrated the entire leadership of the Cafirista renaissance. Carlos Grosso, Jose Luis Manzano and Juan Manuel de la Sota assumed important responsibilities during the Menem administration. Menem Mu was able to function during his ten years in power.
There are no major challenges to the national president as the party's highest authority. The withdrawal from the so-called G8 in 2001 under the command of Carlos Chacho Alvarez only confirmed Menem's leadership. His influence was so strong that withdrawal and flight were preferable to intra-party struggle. This serial pattern was later reinforced with the emergence of Finland Phone Number List Néstor Kirchner and Cristina Fernández as the heraldants of a new hegemony within the party. Eduardo Duhalde was never able to fully cement his internal leadership position. The victory of Kirchnerism over Duhalde in 2006 cemented a new continuity of leadership that would last until 2016, despite its detachments.
Menem's effective dethronement and his transformation into a very irrelevant senator does not cease to amaze those who witnessed the control he exercised at his peak. Only by understanding the role of leadership as the synthesis point of tension within Peronism can we understand the ideological pendulum between the radical neoliberalism of Menimism and the national and popular center-left policies of Kirchnerism. Historically there have always been different positions within so-called national and popular movements. What resolves programmatic inconsistencies is an acceptance of the uniqueness of leadership.
There are no major challenges to the national president as the party's highest authority. The withdrawal from the so-called G8 in 2001 under the command of Carlos Chacho Alvarez only confirmed Menem's leadership. His influence was so strong that withdrawal and flight were preferable to intra-party struggle. This serial pattern was later reinforced with the emergence of Finland Phone Number List Néstor Kirchner and Cristina Fernández as the heraldants of a new hegemony within the party. Eduardo Duhalde was never able to fully cement his internal leadership position. The victory of Kirchnerism over Duhalde in 2006 cemented a new continuity of leadership that would last until 2016, despite its detachments.
Menem's effective dethronement and his transformation into a very irrelevant senator does not cease to amaze those who witnessed the control he exercised at his peak. Only by understanding the role of leadership as the synthesis point of tension within Peronism can we understand the ideological pendulum between the radical neoliberalism of Menimism and the national and popular center-left policies of Kirchnerism. Historically there have always been different positions within so-called national and popular movements. What resolves programmatic inconsistencies is an acceptance of the uniqueness of leadership.
